Sorry to hear that, 92.6 is a very high score. BTW, you mean the host has already known the result on Friday of last week, they informed you OR you contacted them?MSCA2018ABC wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 2:57 amThanks!
Me too.
I got my results from the host with Score 92.6. but not funded. But I still wait for the official emails to know the comments.
I guest that having joint publications with the host supervisor could be a weakness. As someone told me that if reviewers do not like you/your proposal, they could focus on Section 1.2 (Quality and appropriateness of the training and of the two way transfer of knowledge between the
researcher and the host) to "screw" you.
Anw, lets talk about this latter.
2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Thu Feb 07, 2019 3:07 am
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
My host contacted the NCP and I was told by the friend of mine. It seems that cut-off of ENG (my panel) will be about 93.0if2018 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 3:08 amSorry to hear that, 92.6 is a very high score. BTW, you mean the host has already known the result on Friday of last week, they informed you OR you contacted with them?MSCA2018ABC wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 2:57 amThanks!
Me too.
I got my results from the host with Score 92.6. but not funded. But I still wait for the official emails to know the comments.
I guest that having joint publications with the host supervisor could be a weakness. As someone told me that if reviewers do not like you/your proposal, they could focus on Section 1.2 (Quality and appropriateness of the training and of the two way transfer of knowledge between the
researcher and the host) to "screw" you.
Anw, lets talk about this latter.
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Damn, it is so close to the cut-off score. I suspect they just lower your score by intention. Let's see the offical email to explain this.MSCA2018ABC wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 3:14 amMy host contacted the NCP and I was told by the friend of mine. It seems that cut-off of ENG (my panel) will be about 93.0if2018 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 3:08 amSorry to hear that, 92.6 is a very high score. BTW, you mean the host has already known the result on Friday of last week, they informed you OR you contacted with them?MSCA2018ABC wrote: ↑Mon Feb 11, 2019 2:57 am
Thanks!
Me too.
I got my results from the host with Score 92.6. but not funded. But I still wait for the official emails to know the comments.
I guest that having joint publications with the host supervisor could be a weakness. As someone told me that if reviewers do not like you/your proposal, they could focus on Section 1.2 (Quality and appropriateness of the training and of the two way transfer of knowledge between the
researcher and the host) to "screw" you.
Anw, lets talk about this latter.
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
832xxx, nothing yet...
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Is someone asking them on twitter?
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
On a positive note: Now we could reach 400 pages...