2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)

lolome
Posts: 173
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2018 9:26 am

Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)

Post by lolome » Sat Feb 09, 2019 8:10 pm

So, I don't have to wait for the score, as I haven't considered the gender aspects, irrelevant for the topic. I'm screwed!

AdinaBabesh
Posts: 165
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 4:24 pm

Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)

Post by AdinaBabesh » Sat Feb 09, 2019 8:11 pm

If you brought significant arguments for your position, then you should still be optimistic ...
lolome wrote:
Sat Feb 09, 2019 8:10 pm
So, I don't have to wait for the score, as I haven't considered the gender aspects, irrelevant for the topic. I'm screwed!

Dajm
Posts: 109
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2019 6:55 pm

Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)

Post by Dajm » Sat Feb 09, 2019 8:12 pm

You may still get top scores for all other aspects and squeeze through :).
lolome wrote:
Sat Feb 09, 2019 8:10 pm
So, I don't have to wait for the score, as I haven't considered the gender aspects, irrelevant for the topic. I'm screwed!

Bren
Posts: 349
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2019 11:55 pm

Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)

Post by Bren » Sat Feb 09, 2019 8:18 pm

What is your topic? Despite Dan's opinion, I know about these matters.


quote=lolome post_id=6005 time=1549739281 user_id=299]
I know... I just don't want to accept it!
Bren wrote:
Sat Feb 09, 2019 8:03 pm
That has no bearing on its truth.
lolome wrote:
Sat Feb 09, 2019 7:57 pm


Come on! I don't want to believe this!
[/quote]
Last edited by Bren on Sat Feb 09, 2019 8:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.

kassiek
Posts: 159
Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2019 11:04 pm

Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)

Post by kassiek » Sat Feb 09, 2019 8:21 pm

And now we’ve started picking apart our own work trying to guess. I think we really have decended into madness. :?

Dajm
Posts: 109
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2019 6:55 pm

Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)

Post by Dajm » Sat Feb 09, 2019 8:22 pm

Collective madness - the best kind :)
kassiek wrote:
Sat Feb 09, 2019 8:21 pm
And now we’ve started picking apart our own work trying to guess. I think we really have decended into madness. :?

Bren
Posts: 349
Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2019 11:55 pm

Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)

Post by Bren » Sat Feb 09, 2019 8:22 pm

We crossed that line at about page 160


quote=kassiek post_id=6010 time=1549740091 user_id=329]
And now we’ve started picking apart our own work trying to guess. I think we really have decended into madness. :?
[/quote]

kokoroko
Posts: 35
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2019 2:04 pm

Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)

Post by kokoroko » Sat Feb 09, 2019 8:22 pm

danGFSOC wrote:
Sat Feb 09, 2019 8:00 pm
Projects, reports and evaluation reports I read. A friend of mine was not funded for a 0,1 just for not having mentioned IPR, which was totally irrelevant. The following year she submitted the same project and she got it just there were more funding.
What's IPR?

lolome
Posts: 173
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2018 9:26 am

Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)

Post by lolome » Sat Feb 09, 2019 8:27 pm

Environmental science.
Bren wrote:
Sat Feb 09, 2019 8:18 pm
What is your topic? Despite Dan's opinion, I know about these matters.


quote=lolome post_id=6005 time=1549739281 user_id=299]
I know... I just don't want to accept it!
Bren wrote:
Sat Feb 09, 2019 8:03 pm
That has no bearing on its truth.
lolome wrote:
Sat Feb 09, 2019 7:57 pm


Come on! I don't want to believe this!
[/quote]

lolome
Posts: 173
Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2018 9:26 am

Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)

Post by lolome » Sat Feb 09, 2019 8:28 pm

kokoroko wrote:
Sat Feb 09, 2019 8:22 pm
danGFSOC wrote:
Sat Feb 09, 2019 8:00 pm
Projects, reports and evaluation reports I read. A friend of mine was not funded for a 0,1 just for not having mentioned IPR, which was totally irrelevant. The following year she submitted the same project and she got it just there were more funding.
What's IPR?
I think that intellectual property rights

Locked