2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)

[sherpaz]

Still SUBMISSION here! At least we start seeing some movement...

[cukovic]

I think evaluation is better in this moment than ranking. If someone got ranking earlier that probably means he/she is low-scored or ineligible. After updating scores for all they will generate a border line. Any thoughts?

[danGFSOC]

Well, summarising: they closed this week the reserve lists from 2017 and now they are updating 2018. But last year they did this in the first half of January. I hope this doesn't mean that they are in late of 10-15 days compared to 2018...

[Bren]

I'm struggling to think that these changes have any significance. If one imagines that there are likely quite a few people involved in updating our accounts, its unlikely that they would all do it at once. They probably get a bunch of proposals each and an order to 'have it done by Friday at 5pm' or something like that. The variance in our accounts shown in the link could quite easily represent the work practices of staff. In other words, the guy who is dealing with my account could just have a shorter 'to do' list than the guy who is dealing with your account. I dunno, just my thoughts on it.

I think evaluation is better in this moment than ranking. If someone got ranking earlier that probably means he/she is low-scored or ineligible. After updating scores for all they will generate a border line. Any thoughts?

[lolome]

so far no one is in ranking yet...

I think evaluation is better in this moment than ranking. If someone got ranking earlier that probably means he/she is low-scored or ineligible. After updating scores for all they will generate a border line. Any thoughts?

[xman25]

Now I change to EVALUATION after maybe few hours with submission.
They are surely updating.

[evolved]

Unfortunately, I think it's quite likely they are late this year.
The number of proposals this year is larger, and the IT services are not known to often update infrastructure (for obvious reasons of reliability).
There seems to be a pattern that every year they release the results a a couple of days later each time.
Having said all this, it might be reasonable to assume that they will release the final results 1-4 February or even later.

Well, summarising: they closed this week the reserve lists from 2017 and now they are updating 2018. But last year they did this in the first half of January. I hope this doesn't mean that they are in late of 10-15 days compared to 2018...

[sherpaz]

Still SUBMISSION here! At least we start seeing some movement...

My status has just changed to EVALUATION!

[academic_guru]

My status just changed to Evaluation.

[ATBGF2017]

This sounds plausible.

Unfortunately, I think it's quite likely they are late this year.
The number of proposals this year is larger, and the IT services are not known to often update infrastructure (for obvious reasons of reliability).
There seems to be a pattern that every year they release the results a a couple of days later each time.
Having said all this, it might be reasonable to assume that they will release the final results 1-4 February or even later.

Well, summarising: they closed this week the reserve lists from 2017 and now they are updating 2018. But last year they did this in the first half of January. I hope this doesn't mean that they are in late of 10-15 days compared to 2018...