2021 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2021)

[alherpo]

So if we all are moving to ranking that means that being in ranking does not mean getting granted. From previous years we can agree that the sooner you changed from submission to evaluation and ranking, the higher possibilities to get granted. I think it might be that they started with 100 and are going down as suggested.

[Aio]

Hi all! Me 15 minutes ago I went from submission to evaluation and then after 5 min or so to ranking.
I'm in the GF-PHY panel. I think today they are starting filling the Global Fellowship scores.
I guess they are merely inserting the scores in the system. But this means the results could arrive earlier than expected (?).

A question: what is the National Contact Point? The istitution with which one applies?

Me too, just went to evaluation and ranking 5min later

Also from GF-PHY

Where can I find these abbreviations? Maybe it's PF-EF?

[Bahador]

So if we all are moving to ranking that means that being in ranking does not mean getting granted. From previous years we can agree that the sooner you changed from submission to evaluation and ranking, the higher possibilities to get granted. I think it might be that they started with 100 and are going down as suggested.

This is the scenario...
The ranking would be done soon, what would be a key element is the number of over-threshold candidates and the budget available in each panel.
So simply moving into "ranking" does not mean 100% grant arrival!
The problem is now the secondary threshold they would set for those who will get the grant and for those who will dump into the reserve list (like me that with score of 94 dropped into the doomed reserve list), so the budget guys THE AVAILABLE BUDGET is the case.

Best of luck folks...

[Bahador]

The last year percentile:

[UKR]

It seems to be different this year

The last year percentile:

[triad_Mon]

It seems to be different this year

The last year percentile:

Based on the change of the number of proposals to the change in the number of allocated funds, all scores should go higher than last year. Only thing that can change this is the percentage of eligible proposals.

[UKR]

Status should change then?

It seems to be different this year

The last year percentile:

Based on the change of the number of proposals to the change in the number of allocated funds, all scores should go higher than last year. Only thing that can change this is the percentage of eligible proposals.

[Aio]

Is anyone still in "evaluation" status?

[triad_Mon]

Status should change then?

It seems to be different this year

Based on the change of the number of proposals to the change in the number of allocated funds, all scores should go higher than last year. Only thing that can change this is the percentage of eligible proposals.

What do you mean 'status'? Are you referring to the 'phase' metadata field of the 'magic link'? The name says 'phase'.

[UKR]

Yeah then the phase should be changed in few days?

Status should change then?

Based on the change of the number of proposals to the change in the number of allocated funds, all scores should go higher than last year. Only thing that can change this is the percentage of eligible proposals.

What do you mean 'status'? Are you referring to the 'phase' metadata field of the 'magic link'? The name says 'phase'.