Talk Academia

MarieCuR wrote: ↑

Thu Jan 25, 2018 11:06 am

Hi all,

does someone have news about MSC IF results?

Thanks

MSCAIF ENG 2017 wrote: ↑

Thu Jan 25, 2018 11:11 am

We guess that the results may be available on Monday-Tuesday next week

MarieCuR wrote: ↑

Thu Jan 25, 2018 11:06 am

Hi all,

does someone have news about MSC IF results?

Thanks

MSCAIF ENG 2017 wrote: ↑

Thu Jan 25, 2018 11:11 am

We guess that the results may be available on Monday-Tuesday next week

MarieCuR wrote: ↑

Thu Jan 25, 2018 11:06 am

Hi all,

does someone have news about MSC IF results?

Thanks

aberfeldy wrote: ↑

Thu Jan 25, 2018 10:01 am

Imbingo wrote: ↑

Thu Jan 25, 2018 9:56 am

InfoCom wrote: ↑

Thu Jan 25, 2018 9:53 am

seems like people with phase evaluation are out of race. Best of luck for next time

Yea that sounds reasonable...... people with “EVALUATION “ status might have very very low scores

That is unfair! Don't say things like that because you are not sure about it and people can get stressed and upset about it. What is the point of doing this?

laprofesora wrote: ↑

Thu Jan 25, 2018 11:46 am

aberfeldy wrote: ↑

Thu Jan 25, 2018 10:01 am

Imbingo wrote: ↑

Thu Jan 25, 2018 9:56 am

Yea that sounds reasonable...... people with “EVALUATION “ status might have very very low scores

That is unfair! Don't say things like that because you are not sure about it and people can get stressed and upset about it. What is the point of doing this?

I couldn't agree more.
Last year links were revealing pieces of information which are now omitted (and btw these also changed over time before final results were made public, so people who thought were "Accepted above threshold" ended up being "Rejected because of low funding".)
Plus, do you think the data in the links shared by 30 people writing on an online forum are actually a representative sample of a competition between over 9.000 people?
Take a deep breath, y'all!

Imbingo wrote: ↑

Thu Jan 25, 2018 12:20 pm

laprofesora wrote: ↑

Thu Jan 25, 2018 11:46 am

aberfeldy wrote: ↑

Thu Jan 25, 2018 10:01 am

That is unfair! Don't say things like that because you are not sure about it and people can get stressed and upset about it. What is the point of doing this?

I couldn't agree more.
Last year links were revealing pieces of information which are now omitted (and btw these also changed over time before final results were made public, so people who thought were "Accepted above threshold" ended up being "Rejected because of low funding".)
Plus, do you think the data in the links shared by 30 people writing on an online forum are actually a representative sample of a competition between over 9.000 people?
Take a deep breath, y'all!

Yes guess you are right

MarieCuR wrote: ↑

Thu Jan 25, 2018 1:08 pm

Hi guys,

sorry but where exactly you can see RANKING or EVALUATION state?

Thanks
R