ST-LIF wrote: ↑Sun Jan 21, 2018 11:19 pmhmm, no clue... I don't think I ever looked at that either.
Somehow have a feeling that tomorrow is not going to be the announcement day...although I'd be glad to be wrong.
2017 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2017)
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
Anyone who doesn't have this 'GAP-xxxxxx' field yet? I don't think the communication centre tab was on the participant portal until some days ago.
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2018 2:41 am
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
Any update on anyone's Phase ?
Mine is "Ranking" since 12th January but no further update.
Mine is "Ranking" since 12th January but no further update.
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
Hello, where do you find "all messages"? I t is my first time... I can only see "My Notification(s)". Thanksstsoc wrote: ↑Tue Jan 23, 2018 1:26 amAnyone who doesn't have this 'GAP-xxxxxx' field yet? I don't think the communication centre tab was on the participant portal until some days ago.
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
You have to click the 'FO' button beside your proposal.
If you look at the blue box on the left hand side, it has a 'Communication Centre' button, and when you click in there you'll see a dropdown menu.
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
From your link I read this regarding 2014:RANKING wrote: ↑Mon Jan 22, 2018 7:07 pmfor previous years statistics, you can follow this link http://cache.media.education.gouv.fr/fi ... 750373.pdf
and yes, there is crazy 36% in the IF-EF-Society and enterprise panel for the 2016 call
Secondments:
– Of a total number of 7,409 evaluated proposals, 2,189 proposals included a secondment phase (percentage 29.5%)
– Out of a total number of 1,305 retained proposals (main list), 441 proposals included a secondment phase (percentage 33.7%)
It is impressive to see that as a matter of fact, the choice of a secondment period does not represent a strong added value.
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
It is probably that in multidisciplinary projects, a secondment could be important (not essential) for obtaining the fellowship. Especially in the case of projects that include two disciplines not too close. I think, the importance of the secondments depend on the type of project.
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
I can see the GAP-xxxxxx selector too and I don't think it was there before. Can anyone guess what GAP stands for? I thought something along the lines of Grant Agreement P-something. Also my status has changed recently from EVALUATION to RANKING (finished: true) - it was Evaluation on Friday and Ranking today. I guess they are closing up all scientific areas (mine is PHY) and then we should have the results fairly soon - at least I hope!
-
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2018 9:12 am
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
I know, right? Interestingly enough, the absence of secondments was one of the weaknesses evaluators found in my project last year... (and, no, it was not necessary in my SOC project...)
So it's not mandatory, but it can also become a weakness if you do not have one
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
It stands for grant agreement preparation I think. However I have it for last year's rejected proposal also so might just be a standard part of the system.