2017 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2017)

[IF ST LIF]

Reserve list here, 92.6 ST LIF. What a pain... so close I guess!

hey, how do you check you mark?

It was a short window of time during this morning that FO button was working...

[pinedamarcelo]

Reserve list here, 92.6 ST LIF. What a pain... so close I guess!

hey, how do you check you mark?

It was a short window of time during this morning that FO button was working...

hahaha cool! I was absolutely crazy trying to find it. So, let´s the system breath a bit ...

[fun4sci]

Regarding the comments received from the reviewers, don't worry at all.
In my experience, they first decide if the project is to be funded and after that they score it. I do not say that it is always that way. But for me it is very relevant that this time, in which I prepare the proposal with few time since it was a 'last minute' decision, it has been positively evaluated. And I'm sure that are some residual parts (dissemination, training) that are not as well described as it should be. However, the project (and impact) as a whole is very strong and I think the evaluators have taken this into account.

[Scattman]

GOT the Grant agreement notification,WOW!
but I don't the score yet, the EU server is collapsed.

I'm in PHYS panel, 800XXX, and went to RANKING on the 24th.

Congratulation to all the others who got it and to the others:"don't give up". Last year I went into the reserve list and this year I applied with a completely different project and different host. However, last year experience and the reviewers' comments were essential to write a good project this time. Go back on the evaluation letter during the next proposal writing and you'll get something useful out of them.

[klain]

Does anyone has a link with the thresholds of the different panels?

[pinedamarcelo]

Does anyone the maximum time it is possible to postpone the starting?

[Rapaz]

Got the love letter from Marie Curie and won the lottery!!!!!
798XXX, changed to Ranking on 24th.

ST-EF-LIF. No access to my report- the webpage is collapsed

Rapaz Congrats!!! ))

Thanks.
As I can´t see the score (servers collapsed), It´s so hard to believe. But the Proposal is already in Projects section and the emails are clear.

Now, does anyone know if the Grant Agreement is very complicated and time consuming?

96% 4.8/5/4.5

[Reserve]

Does anyone has a link with the thresholds of the different panels?

https://ec.europa.eu/research/participa ... -2017.html#
In the section of Topic conditions and documents, at the end of the section you can find a pdf with the percentile table.

[SOCEF-msca]

I got it! 91.4 SOC Standard
Second time. First with a different host and proposal: 98.2
Looks like cut threshold this year was a bit lower
I went ranked on 24th
id 795xxx
Learning: having got a great feedback the first time has been crucial. Then, try to follow the feedback and share draft with as many people as possible before submitting
Good luck for all

[FuriousAcademic]

Does anyone has a link with the thresholds of the different panels?

https://ec.europa.eu/research/participa ... -2017.html#
In the section of Topic conditions and documents, at the end of the section you can find a pdf with the percentile table.

Interesting, thank you. And I guess that there is no way of knowing the exact threshold?