2017 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2017)
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
Hi! Are you still receiving the ESR? I didn't and I'm worried about it, in case they stop sending responses until tomorrow. Or will they send all of them today?
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
I had a chance to review 3 evaluation reports before application and did not see such stupid comments. I guess Rapaz is right saying that when they don't like your application they make up b.s. comments to reject you.
I hope we got lucky next time. Congrats to all winners. You all deserved it!
I hope we got lucky next time. Congrats to all winners. You all deserved it!
rsr wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:21 amEverybody gets some review comments of questionable quality (myself included). This is how MSCA works... If you intend to re-apply you should keep this in mind (to not get frustrated )!!!InfoCom wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:16 amIn my case review quality is very bad. I can't imagine how some one can give such non serious comments. I am ok I had alternative options but there are people who really need this and reviewer show such non serious attitude.ANGF wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 9:38 amSecond rejection this year. GF-SOC 83%. Reviews were of much higher quality this year, and written in such a way that it is clear how to address them - last year I got a couple of general comments like "insufficient detail"/"insufficient information" that are not helpful for improving a proposal. However I am sure the reviewers will find new weaknesses next year. I am still very disappointed but nothing can be changed now!
In my publication plan, I had the top venues (both conferences and journals) of my domain and I got this comment: "the respective venues are of medium quality". At best, this reviewer is not very familiar with the domain so I wonder why he/she reviewed my proposal.
Not complaining, I knew that it is always possible to get such comments with MSCA...
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
I received the MSCA grant [98.6, ENG, ST]. I plan to change the host as my supervisor will move to another country. He will be still affiliated with the current host but will be only partially available. I wonder how risky it is to change the host using this as a justification. What would you recommend? Anyone has a similar experience?
-
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2018 12:14 pm
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
This is a tricky situation and will be probably assessed on a case-by-case basis. First, you need to have a very serious justification. Second, everyone has to agree (your current host may not be so eager to lose a grant). Third, you need to convince the MCSA people.erkaner wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:34 amI received the MSCA grant [98.6, ENG, ST]. I plan to change the host as my supervisor will move to another country. He will be still affiliated with the current host but will be only partially available. I wonder how risky it is to change the host using this as a justification. What would you recommend? Anyone has a similar experience?
Note that your proposal was evaluated based on the strengths of our host institution (among other things). If the host institution changes then your proposal should be re-evaluated...
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
I think they might agree if you can make a case that your future host is almost as good (or even better) than the current one. A tricky situation indeed.
FuriousAcademic wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:41 amThis is a tricky situation and will be probably assessed on a case-by-case basis. First, you need to have a very serious justification. Second, everyone has to agree (your current host may not be so eager to lose a grant). Third, you need to convince the MCSA people.erkaner wrote: ↑Mon Jan 29, 2018 10:34 amI received the MSCA grant [98.6, ENG, ST]. I plan to change the host as my supervisor will move to another country. He will be still affiliated with the current host but will be only partially available. I wonder how risky it is to change the host using this as a justification. What would you recommend? Anyone has a similar experience?
Note that your proposal was evaluated based on the strengths of our host institution (among other things). If the host institution changes then your proposal should be re-evaluated...
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
rejected GF-ENV
2nd attempt 83%.
ID 7937XX
RANKING since beginning january
1st attempt last year:reserve list 92%
2nd attempt 83%.
ID 7937XX
RANKING since beginning january
1st attempt last year:reserve list 92%
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
I am unable to open MP (Manage project tab) any suggestions?
Re: Marie Curie Individual Fellowship Forum
Got it! PHY panel. It was my 3rd time. However, I am unable to open the MP button...