2017 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2017)

[DougLIF]

So we have 5 rejected, 2 accepted.

How many of you, online folks, are waiting?

Rapaz: 1

Still waiting ..LIF-IF

[Rapaz]

6 rejected (1 was still in Evaluation, 1 went to Ranking on Jan12th), 2 accepted (at least 1 went to Ranking later).

2 waiting

[Lucky2018]

What’s your final result?

Still waiting...

A friend of mine just got rejected...... he’s still in EVALUATION phase until NOW

That sounds terrible.

[Amar]

6 rejected (1 was still in Evaluation, 1 went to Ranking on Jan12th), 2 accepted (1 was still in evaluation, 1 went to Ranking later).

2 waiting

Rapaz, i am waiting also.
Do you know how much from ST- LIF received the results?

[Rapaz]

6 rejected (1 was still in Evaluation, 1 went to Ranking on Jan12th), 2 accepted (1 was still in evaluation, 1 went to Ranking later).

2 waiting

Rapaz, i am waiting also.
Do you know how much from ST- LIF received the results?

At least 1 - rejected with 89%, EF-ST-LIF (went to Ranking on Jan 12th)
And you and me waiting . I went to Ranking 4 days ago, but at this point, I´m almost sure it´s irrelevant.

[IF ST LIF]

Also waiting

[Imbingo]

6 rejected (1 was still in Evaluation, 1 went to Ranking on Jan12th), 2 accepted (1 was still in evaluation, 1 went to Ranking later).

2 waiting

That IF-ENG wasn’t in EVALUATION phase, he/she doesn’t answer you when you asked...... you might have mistaken someone else’s answer with his/hers?

[Rapaz]

6 rejected (1 was still in Evaluation, 1 went to Ranking on Jan12th), 2 accepted (1 was still in evaluation, 1 went to Ranking later).

2 waiting

That IF-ENG wasn’t in EVALUATION phase, he/she doesn’t answer you when you asked...... you might have mistaken someone else’s answer with his/hers?

OMG, you are right!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Sorry, next person said "I am in Evaluation" and I thought it was the lucky winner!!!!!!! Sorry.

[ATBGF2017]

Rjected.

This fucking thing is a huge hoax. Look at the comments below:

The proposal does not make sufficiently clear the number of article/papers to submit. (I did, I even gave the number of articles!)
• The proposal overlaps between communication and dissemination activities. The communication measures are not sufficiently detailed and
not adequately addressed in the Gantt chart (I did address them in the text. There is no need to do it in the Gantt Chart).

[Rapaz]

Rjected.

This fucking thing is a huge hoax. Look at the comments below:

The proposal does not make sufficiently clear the number of article/papers to submit. (I did, I even gave the number of articles!)
• The proposal overlaps between communication and dissemination activities. The communication measures are not sufficiently detailed and
not adequately addressed in the Gantt chart (I did address them in the text. There is no need to do it in the Gantt Chart).

I did not see your proposal, but the communication and number of papers comments were made by total idiots or people that just wanted to screw your proposal because they didnt like it.

BTW, which panel (SOC, ENV, etc) and when did you go to Ranking?

Good luck, as you can see it´s a lottery