2017 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2017)

[Academics_Anonymous]

Anyone has ""canStartGAT":true" toggle?

Mine is "canStartGAT":false, I wonder if this indicates grant agreement.

[aberfeldy]

I guess you didn't work on the gender paragraph in part B. It can help to add some points for the final score

No I did not as it was not relevant to my basic science project. Also, I am a girl so your comment is out of context if you call me a sexist.

Wow, you severely misunderstand the term 'sexist'. FYI, women can be sexist as well. There is a ton of academic research on this topic. You may want to check this article for example (non-academic): https://www.irishtimes.com/life-and-sty ... -1.2877110

Honey I cannot be bothered with the 'someone is wrong on the internet' drama now...

2 days to go

[LazyAnna]

No I did not as it was not relevant to my basic science project. Also, I am a girl so your comment is out of context if you call me a sexist.

Wow, you severely misunderstand the term 'sexist'. FYI, women can be sexist as well. There is a ton of academic research on this topic. You may want to check this article for example (non-academic): https://www.irishtimes.com/life-and-sty ... -1.2877110

Honey I cannot be bothered with the 'someone is wrong on the internet' drama now...

2 days to go

I am not a 'honey'. Calling me that is a great example of you being sexist. Can we now get back on track?!

[LazyAnna]

Anyone has ""canStartGAT":true" toggle?

Mine is "canStartGAT":false, I wonder if this indicates grant agreement.

Nope, I don't think anyone has that. Mine are 'false' in both links.

[Rapaz]

Apparently there is no one left in Evaluation. I just wonder what it means for the proposals whose phase has changed today:

1. If it was similar to last year, it would mean that we scored very low; but they are aware that many people know the "links" (the Status field is hidden now) and they might have changed the settings and way to manage it

2. They were simply following some unclear order of introducing the scores into the system and the time of change Evaluation---->Ranking is irrelevant.

3. The proposals that went to ranking on Jan 12th were easy to rank (very high and very low scores) and then they have been ranking the other ones.

[rsr]

Apparently there is no one left in Evaluation. I just wonder what it means for the proposals whose phase has changed today:

1. If it was similar to last year, it would mean that we scored very low; but they are aware that many people know the "links" (the Status field is hidden now) and they might have changed the settings and way to manage it

2. They were simply following some unclear order of introducing the scores into the system and the time of change Evaluation---->Ranking is irrelevant.

3. The proposals that went to ranking on Jan 12th were easy to rank (very high and very low scores) and then they have been ranking the other ones.

I suggest after the results, to post our phase history and final results... Too much speculation has been going on... It would be good to see if we were right at least...

[If-soc-2018]

I'm SOC and in Evaluation

[laprofesora]

I'm SOC and in Evaluation

Same here... SOC and EVALUATION...

[laprofesora]

Just checked... changed to RANKING today!

[MSCAIF ENG 2017]

I also have RANKING. (ENG Panel). Morning: It was EVALUATION..