+1AndyC wrote: ↑Sun Jan 24, 2021 12:27 pmThe reply to the ethical reviewers is just for clarification of some small issues. I do think that the list is already done and they are waiting just to see if the candidate will answer the ethical aspects correctly. If not she/he might be out from the final list. I agree that they give two weeks for people to answer. But honestly, if I would have received the letter to clarify some issues I would reply within 2 days (MAX) So let's hope that next week something will change about our status to warm up the atmosphere in this forum and we will get emails on 1-2 of February
2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
-
- Posts: 256
- Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2020 5:58 pm
-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2021 8:59 pm
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
Yes, on Monday morning the grant management system will be unavalaible for two hours. Updating?
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
"The Grant Management Services will be experiencing issues on Monday, 25.01.2021, between 7:30 and 8:10"IFCAR-2020 wrote: ↑Sun Jan 24, 2021 1:11 pmYes, on Monday morning the grant management system will be unavalaible for two hours. Updating?
Actually, only 40 mins... let's see if this implies to the current phase change from submission to evaluation to ranking....
-
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2021 1:31 pm
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
Ihmo, it's just standard maintenance.
I think, since the deadline is approaching, they are checking whether everything works fine, in order to avoid any misleading information on the D-Day
I think, since the deadline is approaching, they are checking whether everything works fine, in order to avoid any misleading information on the D-Day
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
I’d also say so! but as everyone else in here, I’d also prefer to find some movement in the portal!! 1st of February works fine for me as well hahaDiatosystem wrote: ↑Sun Jan 24, 2021 1:48 pmIhmo, it's just standard maintenance.
I think, since the deadline is approaching, they are checking whether everything works fine, in order to avoid any misleading information on the D-Day
-
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Tue Jan 19, 2021 1:31 pm
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
I don't know why, but I have the feeling that the D-Day will be on Feb 5th.
ONLY SPECULATION (before create any unmotivated panic ahahah)
ONLY SPECULATION (before create any unmotivated panic ahahah)
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
I prefer this forecast!AndyC wrote: ↑Sun Jan 24, 2021 12:27 pmThe reply to the ethical reviewers is just for clarification of some small issues. I do think that the list is already done and they are waiting just to see if the candidate will answer the ethical aspects correctly. If not she/he might be out from the final list. I agree that they give two weeks for people to answer. But honestly, if I would have received the letter to clarify some issues I would reply within 2 days (MAX) So let's hope that next week something will change about our status to warm up the atmosphere in this forum and we will get emails on 1-2 of February
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2021 11:32 pm
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
This decision-making period is taking way too long. I mean, the review results were due in early December. Taking two more months to compile the list is just absurd. But even more than that: unless the commission itself interferes in the scores, the final results were available sometime in December when the reviews were submitted; so why not simply inform us of the score? This way we will at least have some idea of what to expect...
Re: 2020 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2020)
In my opinion there should be, at least, an intermediase phase in December to inform those not reaching a minimum cutoff so that you can focus on other grants/jobs. 5 months waiting for the results it’s too much in my opinion as well, but I guess there is plenty of bureaucracy involved in the process that makes it that slow... just two of three more weeks guys!!mArkangjel wrote: ↑Sun Jan 24, 2021 5:18 pmThis decision-making period is taking way too long. I mean, the review results were due in early December. Taking two more months to compile the list is just absurd. But even more than that: unless the commission itself interferes in the scores, the final results were available sometime in December when the reviews were submitted; so why not simply inform us of the score? This way we will at least have some idea of what to expect...