-
Bloom
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2020 12:59 pm
Post
by Bloom » Sun Feb 07, 2021 11:04 am
Dreamer wrote: ↑Sun Feb 07, 2021 10:01 am
Hi folks
I hope that you are fine
Gpod vibes!
Hi Dreamer, I loss the lottery, but I am sure I gained a friend:)
Have a nice day too and keep the momentum
-
MSCA_ENG20
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2020 12:28 pm
Post
by MSCA_ENG20 » Sun Feb 07, 2021 11:04 am
According to several testimonials here, the lottery aspect indeed seems to be extremely high.
For all of us who believe it is the case,
please register as reviewers for the next calls!
Everyone can register to volunteer as a reviewer, so let's change the system from the inside and be the reviewer we would have liked to have.
-
aplampro
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Tue Feb 04, 2020 11:17 am
Post
by aplampro » Sun Feb 07, 2021 11:10 am
MSCA_ENG20 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 07, 2021 11:04 am
According to several testimonials here, the lottery aspect indeed seems to be extremely high.
For all of us who believe it is the case,
please register as reviewers for the next calls!
Everyone can register to volunteer as a reviewer, so let's change the system from the inside and be the reviewer we would have liked to have.
And how can one register as reviewer?
-
VirMs
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2021 7:22 pm
Post
by VirMs » Sun Feb 07, 2021 11:10 am
MSCA_ENG20 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 07, 2021 11:04 am
According to several testimonials here, the lottery aspect indeed seems to be extremely high.
For all of us who believe it is the case,
please register as reviewers for the next calls!
Everyone can register to volunteer as a reviewer, so let's change the system from the inside and be the reviewer we would have liked to have.
How do we do it? Let’s change the system from inside.
Can I apply even though I failed ?
-
Mary_dramaqueen
- Posts: 34
- Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2021 8:16 pm
Post
by Mary_dramaqueen » Sun Feb 07, 2021 11:10 am
MSCA_ENG20 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 07, 2021 11:04 am
According to several testimonials here, the lottery aspect indeed seems to be extremely high.
For all of us who believe it is the case,
please register as reviewers for the next calls!
Everyone can register to volunteer as a reviewer, so let's change the system from the inside and be the reviewer we would have liked to have.
Can we do that? How it works? This is so interesting
-
MALEK
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2021 8:05 pm
Post
by MALEK » Sun Feb 07, 2021 11:12 am
I wish I can know my results before the official ones.
-
MALEK
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2021 8:05 pm
Post
by MALEK » Sun Feb 07, 2021 11:15 am
Dreamer wrote: ↑Sun Feb 07, 2021 10:01 am
Hi folks
I hope that you are fine
Gpod vibes!
Hello and thanks for the help yesterday. You are legendary mate!!
-
Gyttha
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Sat Feb 06, 2021 6:09 pm
Post
by Gyttha » Sun Feb 07, 2021 11:30 am
Its not just the reviewer lottery, the system is also really broken if you don't even make the cut with a 94. I mean that's a near-perfect proposal. Not even a Science (or insert chosen top journal in your field) paper is perfect! What kind of logic is there for a training-oriented funding body to only fund absolutely perfect proposals...?
-
rf91
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2020 1:00 pm
Post
by rf91 » Sun Feb 07, 2021 11:37 am
Just to support the submission - evaluation - ranking theory.
I went to evaluation as most of this forum - around noon of SE time. However, I have been waiting for ranking till 6pm. Got 87.8% bellow the budget.