Talk Academia

Given the scores we are reporting here, can it be possible that there might be around 100 people on the reserve list for each panel??? I guess they did a particularly long reserve list just in case there's a no-deal Brexit...

SUPERBRAIN wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:12 pm

MSCA_2018 Scores.jpg

I think ST-AAA are Standard and GF-AAA are the Global Fellowships.

Frydendahl wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:25 pm

SUPERBRAIN wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:12 pm

MSCA_2018 Scores.jpg

These are just the Global Fellowship numbers, correct?

Can't believe scores are all out and still don't know mine - 846xxx

Pardon my unawareness but how does Brexit affect those?

fr489 wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:25 pm

Given the scores we are reporting here, can it be possible that there might be around 100 people on the reserve list for each panel??? I guess they did a particularly long reserve list just in case there's a no-deal Brexit...

SUPERBRAIN wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:12 pm

MSCA_2018 Scores.jpg

buk wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:29 pm

Can't believe scores are all out and still don't know mine - 846xxx

Have you checked process document?

Excellence:
W - It is not sufficiently convincing that the experienced researcher will gain many new skills and competences during the fellowship, her/his maturity is above average.

Impact:
S - The new competences and skills (for example in presenting and managing) that the researcher would acquire during the project complement very well the researcher’s current background and knowledge and would allow the researcher to acquire an international profile. Additionally, they involve the preparation of future grant proposals.

Impact:
S - The nature of the planned communication measures (social media, press articles,) is well-chosen to create awareness of the project in the wider public in the researcher's home country.
W - The proposed outreach activities are aimed mostly to a different country than the country where research will be located.


I did receive my score, 75, first time application in Soc. The comments are a bit contradicting between the strength (mostly very good and excellent) and the weaknesses:

Excellence:
S - It is credible that the researcher will reinforce professional maturity.
W - It is not sufficiently convincing that the experienced researcher will gain many new skills and competences during the fellowship, her/his maturity is above average.

Impact:
S- The foreseen outreach activities envisaged as part of the proposal would enhance in an excellent way the international visibility of the researcher.
W- The proposed outreach activities are aimed mostly to a different country than the country where research will be located.

Implementation:
S - The Gantt chart is clear and thoroughly planned. It includes six work packages focused on project objectives, with major deliverables and milestones which develop a feasible and appropriate plan.
W - The high number of deliverables is not convincingly justified.
[/quote]

hmdoel wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:30 pm

buk wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:29 pm

Can't believe scores are all out and still don't know mine - 846xxx

Have you checked process document?

yes, several times. same as before. no email.

EDIT: Now realized that this was for GF, not IF. Makes sense.

SUPERBRAIN wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:12 pm

MSCA_2018 Scores.jpg

846xxx still nothing in portal or email for me but guessing any minute now.

Damn, so my cut-off in ST-PHYS seems to be 90.8, while my score is just 90. Guess I need to start praying for a no-deal Brexit

CatalysaurusRex wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:28 pm

I think ST-AAA are Standard and GF-AAA are the Global Fellowships.

Frydendahl wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:25 pm

SUPERBRAIN wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 12, 2019 12:12 pm

MSCA_2018 Scores.jpg

These are just the Global Fellowship numbers, correct?