Talk Academia

Successful dudes, do you see any changes in the "famous link"? Especially in "finished" phase?

expert_pastMC wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 12, 2019 2:08 am

xman25 wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 12, 2019 2:04 am

MscaEnv wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 12, 2019 2:01 am

Is this your first attempt?

yes, what I can observe from the report is they keep saying blablabla is not sufficient enough.

I guess this means they didn't like the project. Totally subjective... which shouldn't be. Do they give examples of why blah blah is not sufficient?

examples

state of the art is not sufficiently detailed, and relevant aspects connected to the project have been insufficiently outlined.
two insufficient in one sentence.

planned public engagements /outreach activities of the researcher are not sufficiently detailed.
What I can expect from this?

Can I apply for re-evaluation? At least not with such a low score.

elii wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 12, 2019 2:10 am

Successful dudes, do you see any changes in the "famous link"? Especially in "finished" phase?

could you post the link again_

lolome wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 12, 2019 2:11 am

elii wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 12, 2019 2:10 am

Successful dudes, do you see any changes in the "famous link"? Especially in "finished" phase?

could you post the link again_

here you are:

https://ec.europa.eu/research/participa ... teproject/

could not see any useful comments from the last year`s report

elii wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 12, 2019 2:12 am

lolome wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 12, 2019 2:11 am

elii wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 12, 2019 2:10 am

Successful dudes, do you see any changes in the "famous link"? Especially in "finished" phase?

could you post the link again_

here you are:

https://ec.europa.eu/research/participa ... teproject/

phase: NEGOTIATION

lolome wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 12, 2019 2:12 am

elii wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 12, 2019 2:12 am

lolome wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 12, 2019 2:11 am

could you post the link again_

here you are:

https://ec.europa.eu/research/participa ... teproject/

phase: NEGOTIATION

Thanks. How about this one "canStartGAT"?

expert_pastMC wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 12, 2019 1:53 am

kokoroko wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 12, 2019 1:51 am

832xxx. 86, rejected. Soc if st. Was in ranking.

Sorry about that

Thanks. My first attempt. At least I see I did good, which gives me hope for the other scholarships I am also applying.

The comments were a bit past the target, focusing largely on two hot topics I mentioned in passing and which were clearly not the essence of the project. But I guess it’s a learning curve and I may resubmit next year because 86 is pretty good for the first try and being fresh out of my phd. I just hope I won’t be unemployed in the meanwhile...

elii wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 12, 2019 2:13 am

lolome wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 12, 2019 2:12 am

elii wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 12, 2019 2:12 am

here you are:

https://ec.europa.eu/research/participa ... teproject/

phase: NEGOTIATION

Thanks. How about this one "canStartGAT"?

false

lolome wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 12, 2019 2:14 am

elii wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 12, 2019 2:13 am

lolome wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 12, 2019 2:12 am

phase: NEGOTIATION

Thanks. How about this one "canStartGAT"?

false

Thanks, good luck in your career.