2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)

[evolved]

But I am saying again that last year people were in various statuses on the out-of-date link. One was still in SUBMISSION in the out-of-date and went into RANKING in the actual link. So people in EVALUATION in the out-of-date could be in RANKING!!!!
The IT people know this, so they have completely shielded from leaks. There is nothing that can support a "trend".

[sound]

This part is rather the conditions for the additional members one has added and their access restrictions. Nothing to do with the application itself is my guess.

Hello all,
Is it possible for someone in Evaluation can post these details?

[evolved]

There was one thing different between out of date and actual link:

"proposal":true,"finished":false}
or
"proposal":true,"finished":true}

which is also random information. Difficult to know

This part is rather the conditions for the additional members one has added and their access restrictions. Nothing to do with the application.

Hello all,
Is it possible for someone in Evaluation can post these details?

[Bren]

No, its the opposite. they start at 100% and then count backwards until the available funding is gone, that's how they reach the cut off point. So, if we assume your process has logic, then the earlier ranked got the highest scores. However, I think all this speculation is just that: speculation. None of us know shit.

maybe ranking means putting evaluated proposal into the ranked list from treshold up to 100.
so, who got earlier just has lower position. thus lower chances to be in the funded list.

[evolved]

The time of the updates was clearly related to the ID of the proposal. But as I said, there is simply no trend as we are dealing with out of date info.

No, its the opposite. they start at 100% and then count backwards until the available funding is gone, that's how they reach the cut off point. So, if we assume your process has logic, then the earlier ranked got the highest scores. However, I think all this speculation is just that: speculation. None of us know shit.

maybe ranking means putting evaluated proposal into the ranked list from treshold up to 100.
so, who got earlier just has lower position. thus lower chances to be in the funded list.

[sound]

I like your optimism from Im getting it this year for sure to this post

No, its the opposite. they start at 100% and then count backwards until the available funding is gone, that's how they reach the cut off point. So, if we assume your process has logic, then the earlier ranked got the highest scores. However, I think all this speculation is just that: speculation. None of us know shit.

maybe ranking means putting evaluated proposal into the ranked list from treshold up to 100.
so, who got earlier just has lower position. thus lower chances to be in the funded list.

[Bren]

That is true.

I reckon if one was to stay on this forum long enough one would start quoting ones earlier posts and start arguing with oneself.

The time of the updates was clearly related to the ID of the proposal. But as I said, there is simply no trend as we are dealing with out of date info.

No, its the opposite. they start at 100% and then count backwards until the available funding is gone, that's how they reach the cut off point. So, if we assume your process has logic, then the earlier ranked got the highest scores. However, I think all this speculation is just that: speculation. None of us know shit.

maybe ranking means putting evaluated proposal into the ranked list from treshold up to 100.
so, who got earlier just has lower position. thus lower chances to be in the funded list.

[Bren]

I like your optimism from Im getting it this year for sure to this post

No, its the opposite. they start at 100% and then count backwards until the available funding is gone, that's how they reach the cut off point. So, if we assume your process has logic, then the earlier ranked got the highest scores. However, I think all this speculation is just that: speculation. None of us know shit.

maybe ranking means putting evaluated proposal into the ranked list from treshold up to 100.
so, who got earlier just has lower position. thus lower chances to be in the funded list.

[Bren]

I just really want to go back to Belfast. I worked there for 2 years before and I love the place, best people in the world. I can shuffle my way from Dublin to Belfast: Mobility my ass

I like your optimism from Im getting it this year for sure to this post

No, its the opposite. they start at 100% and then count backwards until the available funding is gone, that's how they reach the cut off point. So, if we assume your process has logic, then the earlier ranked got the highest scores. However, I think all this speculation is just that: speculation. None of us know shit.

[sound]

Haha, I am applying to Ireland actually from France.

I just really want to go back to Belfast. I worked there for 2 years before and I love the place, best people in the world. I can shuffle my way from Dublin to Belfast: Mobility my ass

I like your optimism from Im getting it this year for sure to this post