2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Same here... I'm 845. I just hope it's not gonna take too much time to fix the problem
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
The link works again. Still ranking. 845xxx.
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
8442, just got the e-mailAdinaBabesh wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 9:15 amDid anyone above 8445** receive any message? I cannot access the follow-up ...
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
846xxx and nothing here...so going to work.
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
In my case, most of what's listed as "weaknesses" are actually questions that could have been easily answered. Like, how well do you speak the languages of the case countries? - Fluently, please refer to the resume. Or, Have you considered gender aspects? - Yes, I have but my focus is on social meanings shares by both genders. Etc, etc. What's frustrating is that even though the project is relatively highly scored, the reviews look sloppy. This year's reviews contradict last year's and it is clear that even though specifically asked to consider previous feedback this year's reviewers did not bother to reconcile the differences in opinion. There is also a factually erroneous comment which states that the time frame of the analysis is not mentioned (it is). I don't mind losing a tough competition (to the lucky ones here) but the basis of rejection as it's presented in the reviews seems ungrounded and the reviews are beyond spurious..
IF ST LIF wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 9:25 amNo idea how. But to me, this is a total lottery. Evaluation process is nothing but subjective.MSCA-IF-CAR_2018 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 7:17 amWaw, that is crazy!
How is that possible?????!!!!!!
Last edited by Dajm on Tue Feb 12, 2019 9:45 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2019 10:51 am
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Another 844xxx here... got an email but the portal is suuuuuper slow...
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
[/quote]IF ST LIF wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 9:25 amNo idea how. But to me, this is a total lottery. Evaluation process is nothing but subjective.MSCA-IF-CAR_2018 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 7:17 amWaw, that is crazy!
How is that possible?????!!!!!!
Last edited by Dajm on Tue Feb 12, 2019 9:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
For you guys reference, I got funded and the phase now changed to phase":"NEGOTIATION. Congrats to those who successfully secured the fund. Its not easy. Well done. For those not get funded this time, you are already very very excellent but the fund is too competitive. Stay strong and try again this year. I wish you big luck next time. To those guys not get any info until now, be patient and you will get the notification email in the following several minutes. Good luck everyone. Thank you for accompanying me these 2 weeks to let me know I am not alone. Thank you very very much!
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Agree with you. As an example, last year gantt chart was amazing, very organized and clear. This year, it was the same, with the only addition of persons-months and they said that it is a mess and not clear. WTF!Dajm wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 9:35 amIn my case, most of what's listed as "weaknesses" are actually questions that could have been easily answered. Like, how well do you speak the languages of the case countries? - Fluently, please refer to the resume. Or, Have you considered gender aspects? - Yes, I have but my focus is on social meanings shares by both genders. Etc, etc. What's frustrating is that even though the projects is relatively highly scored, the reviews look sloppy. This year's reviews contradict last year's and it is clear that even though specifically asked to consider previous feedback this year's reviewers did not bother to reconcile the differences in opinion. There is also a factually erroneous comment which states that the time frame of the analysis is not mentioned (it is).
IF ST LIF wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 9:25 amNo idea how. But to me, this is a total lottery. Evaluation process is nothing but subjective.MSCA-IF-CAR_2018 wrote: ↑Tue Feb 12, 2019 7:17 amWaw, that is crazy!
How is that possible?????!!!!!!
-
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2019 6:31 pm
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
They just uploaded an 'ethics report" in my documents, saying the proposal is "ethics ready"!! Did nit receive an ethics report last year
Id: 845
Id: 845