2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)

[Flocci]

The UK NCP does not want to share the results. They have been vague in the email saying that they still don’t know when the results wil be communicated. So I assume no one would be able to get it through them.

[traxtibidox]

Hey Smart People,
I would appreciate if you advise me on one issue.
I got my PhD two years ago, since then I haven't had any academic employment, since then I'm freelancing in the non-academic sector to make ends meet. Moreover, I haven't had employment during my PhD studies as well. I'm frequently applying for various positions and up to now it was a failure. And by the time my hope that I will get some position, even a temporary one is diminishing. And I feel that MSCA-IF-2018 is my last chance to get onto the board.
If I fail this one too, what are the chances that I will get some even temporary research position in EU or elsewhere?

[lolome]

The UK NCP does not want to share the results. They have been vague in the email saying that they still don’t know when the results wil be communicated. So I assume no one would be able to get it through them.

Same the Spanish NCP.

[MSCIF2018SE]

Any one, got there project changed from Proposal to Project section.

Does in Evaluation means rejection.

Evaluation points to below the threshold <70%

Ranking >70% Then some of them will be lucky to be above the cut off.

[MscaEnv]

Are the offices open on Saturday?

Rejected 76.2. Env if. 844***.

Answer received from EU funding office at my host university in Germany. Ask around, results are probably distributed to another international offices too. And DAMN they have results since Wednesday.

~10k applications and ~14% acceptance rate is almost a magic to win. This is a massive FRUSTRATION ! I will try something else with the same proposal.

Best of luck!

I’m sorry. From where do you got the answer? I wrote a German office a few days ago but not successful. Thanks!

Saw their email this morning. Damn

[kokoroko]

Keep in mind that even if the evaluation<70/ranking>70 hypothesis is true, it only increases the chances from ~14% to ~20% for those who are in ranking. So still ~80% probability of rejection...

[MscaEnv]

Keep in mind that even if the evaluation<70/ranking>70 hypothesis is true, it only increases the chances from ~14% to ~20% for those who are in ranking. So still ~80% probability of rejection...

True. Number of <70 vs accepted is almost the same for some panels. The most of us ranked are probably in between and probably below winning threshold. I was ranking and got over 70.

[Cla]

That is not true, the chances of rejection are 65% for those in ranking...

Keep in mind that even if the evaluation<70/ranking>70 hypothesis is true, it only increases the chances from ~14% to ~20% for those who are in ranking. So still ~80% probability of rejection...

[Cla]

I'm 100% sure that the results he provided are true.

How many of you got the result from Cukovic and trust that it is true?

[deepaktg]

Mine - says Evaluation. So does it mean it is rejected then .