-
CountZ
- Site Admin
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2017 7:14 pm
Post
by CountZ » Tue Jan 29, 2019 6:01 pm
Based on this information:
1. Last year those ranked first (around Jan 12) did not receive the fellowship. Those ranked last did. (I think this is correct but am not 100% sure).
2. Most people this year appear ranked, very few are still in evaluation. Most people get rejected and few get it.
As an initial hypothesis:
It could very well be that those still in evaluation got it.
Still, lots of doubts here and don't get your hopes up either way as that would be irresponsible.
-
Cla
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2019 9:48 am
Post
by Cla » Tue Jan 29, 2019 6:07 pm
I agree with Bren. Based on previous years, my guess (or hopes
) is that we will have them on Friday
Bren wrote: ↑Tue Jan 29, 2019 3:47 pm
If it begins to look like everyone is being ranked today then I reckon results will be very soon. As I wrote in an earlier post, there appears to have been some kind of problem in HQ and they are now scrambling to catch up and get this done.
CountZ wrote: ↑Tue Jan 29, 2019 3:45 pm
Yes but also the ranking was done in more than one stage. So some people had ranking while others were on evaluation - with something like a week or two between everyone being ranked.
SOC-2018 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 29, 2019 3:43 pm
last year People went into "RANKING" starting from Jan 12 (if I'm not mistaken) and the results were out on Jan 28 or 9!
-
CountZ
- Site Admin
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Thu Jun 01, 2017 7:14 pm
Post
by CountZ » Tue Jan 29, 2019 6:11 pm
I'm going through the 2017 thread now to find a correlation between evaluation -> ranking and acceptance. Be back soon with the results.
-
lolome
- Posts: 173
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2018 9:26 am
Post
by lolome » Tue Jan 29, 2019 6:13 pm
This link should be forbidden!
CountZ wrote: ↑Tue Jan 29, 2019 6:11 pm
I'm going through the 2017 thread now to find a correlation between evaluation -> ranking and acceptance. Be back soon with the results.
-
Cla
- Posts: 141
- Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2019 9:48 am
Post
by Cla » Tue Jan 29, 2019 6:14 pm
I´ve already done it and there is no corralation at all
CountZ wrote: ↑Tue Jan 29, 2019 6:11 pm
I'm going through the 2017 thread now to find a correlation between evaluation -> ranking and acceptance. Be back soon with the results.
-
megasphaera
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2019 2:55 pm
Post
by megasphaera » Tue Jan 29, 2019 6:14 pm
Indeed!!!!
lolome wrote: ↑Tue Jan 29, 2019 6:13 pm
This link should be forbidden!
CountZ wrote: ↑Tue Jan 29, 2019 6:11 pm
I'm going through the 2017 thread now to find a correlation between evaluation -> ranking and acceptance. Be back soon with the results.
-
cukovic
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2019 4:47 am
Post
by cukovic » Tue Jan 29, 2019 6:22 pm
Maybe these reminded in evaluation phase are illegible or didn't pass 70%?
-
ATBGF2017
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2018 1:31 pm
Post
by ATBGF2017 » Tue Jan 29, 2019 6:25 pm
That is also a possibility.
cukovic wrote: ↑Tue Jan 29, 2019 6:22 pm
Maybe these reminded in evaluation phase are illegible or didn't pass 70%?
-
Bren
- Posts: 349
- Joined: Sat Jan 12, 2019 11:55 pm
Post
by Bren » Tue Jan 29, 2019 6:27 pm
Very unlikely.
cukovic wrote: ↑Tue Jan 29, 2019 6:22 pm
Maybe these reminded in evaluation phase are illegible or didn't pass 70%?
-
evolved
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2019 2:46 pm
Post
by evolved » Tue Jan 29, 2019 6:29 pm
As I said before, people in <70% are also a rarity. Few proposals reach <70%
ATBGF2017 wrote: ↑Tue Jan 29, 2019 6:25 pm
That is also a possibility.
cukovic wrote: ↑Tue Jan 29, 2019 6:22 pm
Maybe these reminded in evaluation phase are illegible or didn't pass 70%?