2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
there are three possibilities:
1. people that remain in evaluation and go into ranking late are winners.
2. people that remain in evaluation and don’t go into ranking are in the <70% threshold.
3. evaluation and ranking depend on ID and panel, and do not predict anything.
pick your favorite explanation that will help you sleep tonight
1. people that remain in evaluation and go into ranking late are winners.
2. people that remain in evaluation and don’t go into ranking are in the <70% threshold.
3. evaluation and ranking depend on ID and panel, and do not predict anything.
pick your favorite explanation that will help you sleep tonight
Last edited by evolved on Tue Jan 29, 2019 4:15 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
839XXX - Ranking
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Obviously I will choose 1evolved wrote: ↑Tue Jan 29, 2019 4:13 pmthere are three possibilities:
1. people that remain in evaluation go into ranking late are winners.
2. people that remain in evaluation and don’t go into ranking are in the <70% threshold.
3. evaluation and ranking depend on ID and panel, and do not predict anything.
pick your favorite explanation that will help you sleep tonight
Declaration of interest: still in evaluation
-
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Mon Jan 14, 2019 2:55 pm
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
That's for sure. We have no idea, so please do not stress yourself and most importantly do not stress the others!
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Unfortunately the percentages of people <70% and that get the funding are more or less very similar ~10-20%.
So all scenarios "fit".
So all scenarios "fit".
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Options 1 and 2 happened last year. You never know. Although this year they might have changed the way that the system encodes everything in the database...evolved wrote: ↑Tue Jan 29, 2019 4:13 pmthere are three possibilities:
1. people that remain in evaluation and go into ranking late are winners.
2. people that remain in evaluation and don’t go into ranking are in the <70% threshold.
3. evaluation and ranking depend on ID and panel, and do not predict anything.
pick your favorite explanation that will help you sleep tonight
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
Am I the only one who thinks its weird that this link even exists? Bit of a messed up way to follow the progression of ones evaluation...
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
I think it is not a good idea to join or read this forum if you anyone doesnt want to feel stress
a right amount of stress can be fun sometimes
a right amount of stress can be fun sometimes
megasphaera wrote: ↑Tue Jan 29, 2019 4:17 pmThat's for sure. We have no idea, so please do not stress yourself and most importantly do not stress the others!
Re: 2018 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2018)
evolved wrote: ↑Tue Jan 29, 2019 4:13 pm
there are three possibilities:
1. people that remain in evaluation and go into ranking late are winners.
2. people that remain in evaluation and don’t go into ranking are in the <70% threshold.
3. evaluation and ranking depend on ID and panel, and do not predict anything.
pick your favorite explanation that will help you sleep tonight
I am still on evaluation but I am sure to be over the threshold, so I woul exclude the option 2
there are three possibilities:
1. people that remain in evaluation and go into ranking late are winners.
2. people that remain in evaluation and don’t go into ranking are in the <70% threshold.
3. evaluation and ranking depend on ID and panel, and do not predict anything.
pick your favorite explanation that will help you sleep tonight
I am still on evaluation but I am sure to be over the threshold, so I woul exclude the option 2