Re: 2021 Marie Curie Postdoctoral Fellowship (HE-MSCA-PF-2021)
Posted: Thu Mar 17, 2022 6:10 pm
Yeah if the phase-change time would be indicative of success or score, it would be very weird as score/success would also somehow correlate with the initial letter of the acronym (at least based on these limited observations)Maaaastricht wrote: ↑Thu Mar 17, 2022 6:07 pmHmm… in SOC EF it looks pretty clear that A-O or A-P were ranked 1 March and the rest on 2 March.AnotherCandidate wrote: ↑Thu Mar 17, 2022 5:49 pmI'm in the same situation as you and indeed, it sounds bad for us...XmendeleievX wrote: ↑Thu Mar 17, 2022 4:57 pmChecking the table that we are building together I realized that someone with my same panel (CHE), same type of fellowship (GF) and first letter of acronym very close to mine (S vs P) went to ranking the 1st of march while I went to ranking on the 2nd. This seems to invalidate the theories of acronym order and panels order, and goes again in the direction of ranking by score, which is quite bad for me by the way.
(https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... =782972678)
New hypothesis: those who went to ranking on March 1st in the morning got the grant (EF and GF) and the rest is in waiting list (the rest of the EF went to ranking on March 1 afternoon, and the GF on March 2)