2019 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2019)

Robrad30
Posts: 96
Joined: Wed Jan 01, 2020 9:25 pm

Re: 2019 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2019)

Post by Robrad30 » Tue Feb 04, 2020 6:06 am

I’ve clear methodology in mine to address gender specific differences, and I have a whole paragraph of the very limited space we had for the state of the art given over to the differences in muscle biology of males and females and they still said I didn’t address gender differences. Maybe they are looking for it in a specific part of the proposal and don’t pay heed to it elsewhere? Either way, sorry you didn’t get it PetetheCat. You’re right, it is a lottery.
PetetheCat wrote:
Tue Feb 04, 2020 5:56 am
I have a lot to say, but let me just say this about the review comments (in which it was clear that at least one reviewer had taken against my proposal, causing a significant drop in the score when all the elements they criticised were better than last year):
  • They said that I did not address gender elements
    I did address gender elements, in multiple places
    Also, I am actually a gender scholar and this is explicitly stated in my proposal
    The word gender appears six times in my proposal
    My proposal has an aim of helping some areas be better with regard to gender relations
I agree with anyone who thinks that this is a lottery. I cannot find any other way to describe it. But I am less sad now I have read the comments because they are so egregious.

meatuk
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2020 6:25 pm

Re: 2019 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2019)

Post by meatuk » Tue Feb 04, 2020 6:13 am

MSCAA2019 wrote:
Tue Feb 04, 2020 5:42 am
SOC-2018 wrote:
Tue Feb 04, 2020 5:37 am
MSCAA2019 wrote:
Tue Feb 04, 2020 5:27 am


I don't see "my projects". I see "my proposals". There?
Try this link:
[url]https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tende ... ojects[url]
thanks! but it goes to my proposals.
When the proposal gets funded it goes into my project.

MSCA_SOC_2019
Posts: 313
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2020 2:17 pm

Re: 2019 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2019)

Post by MSCA_SOC_2019 » Tue Feb 04, 2020 6:15 am

Guy's I got it 95.40! SOC-EF

I cannot believe it!

meatuk
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2020 6:25 pm

Re: 2019 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2019)

Post by meatuk » Tue Feb 04, 2020 6:15 am

MSCA_SOC_2019 wrote:
Tue Feb 04, 2020 6:15 am
Guy's I got it 95.40! SOC-EF

I cannot believe it!
ID?

MSCA_SOC_2019
Posts: 313
Joined: Sun Jan 19, 2020 2:17 pm

Re: 2019 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2019)

Post by MSCA_SOC_2019 » Tue Feb 04, 2020 6:17 am

meatuk wrote:
Tue Feb 04, 2020 6:15 am
MSCA_SOC_2019 wrote:
Tue Feb 04, 2020 6:15 am
Guy's I got it 95.40! SOC-EF

I cannot believe it!
ID?
891XXX
I looked at the portal

meatuk
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2020 6:25 pm

Re: 2019 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2019)

Post by meatuk » Tue Feb 04, 2020 6:18 am

MSCA_SOC_2019 wrote:
Tue Feb 04, 2020 6:17 am
meatuk wrote:
Tue Feb 04, 2020 6:15 am
MSCA_SOC_2019 wrote:
Tue Feb 04, 2020 6:15 am
Guy's I got it 95.40! SOC-EF

I cannot believe it!
ID?
891XXX
I looked at the portal
Where did you see in the portal, please?

PetetheCat
Posts: 323
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2019 2:04 am

Re: 2019 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2019)

Post by PetetheCat » Tue Feb 04, 2020 6:19 am

Robrad30 wrote:
Tue Feb 04, 2020 6:06 am
I’ve clear methodology in mine to address gender specific differences, and I have a whole paragraph of the very limited space we had for the state of the art given over to the differences in muscle biology of males and females and they still said I didn’t address gender differences. Maybe they are looking for it in a specific part of the proposal and don’t pay heed to it elsewhere? Either way, sorry you didn’t get it PetetheCat. You’re right, it is a lottery.
PetetheCat wrote:
Tue Feb 04, 2020 5:56 am
I have a lot to say, but let me just say this about the review comments (in which it was clear that at least one reviewer had taken against my proposal, causing a significant drop in the score when all the elements they criticised were better than last year):
  • They said that I did not address gender elements
    I did address gender elements, in multiple places
    Also, I am actually a gender scholar and this is explicitly stated in my proposal
    The word gender appears six times in my proposal
    My proposal has an aim of helping some areas be better with regard to gender relations
I agree with anyone who thinks that this is a lottery. I cannot find any other way to describe it. But I am less sad now I have read the comments because they are so egregious.
I referred to it in four different places in the excellence section where it is meant to be evaluated. Last year I said less about gender; it was there but much more implicit. And I got a positive comment on this front. I got worried I should be more explicit and I get this . . .

schemist2019
Posts: 15
Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2020 3:29 pm

Re: 2019 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2019)

Post by schemist2019 » Tue Feb 04, 2020 6:27 am

guys, how can I understand which scores are on the reservation lists?

FestivusShadow
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2020 2:46 pm

Re: 2019 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2019)

Post by FestivusShadow » Tue Feb 04, 2020 6:30 am

No mails..No updates on the portal too :evil:

aZr
Posts: 7
Joined: Wed Jan 29, 2020 5:29 am

Re: 2019 Marie Curie Individual Fellowship (H2020-MSCA-IF-2019)

Post by aZr » Tue Feb 04, 2020 6:32 am

People are just lying about score. The system send emails almost altogether, and score are not displayed in the portal. Those who are claiming are urged to share a screenshot here

Locked