Only related to "Reserve list" Q&A 2022
Re: Only related to "Reserve list" Q&A 2022
EF-LIF with 86.6 in the reserve list. I am not sure if that even makes any sense. Why would EC put low scores like mine in the reserve list? Any thoughts?
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2021 11:54 am
Re: Only related to "Reserve list" Q&A 2022
I've just been told that the ranking for reserve list is not available. weird that others were told something else
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2023 6:00 pm
Re: Only related to "Reserve list" Q&A 2022
I was also told that it was not available (France)goshgoshgosh wrote: ↑Mon Feb 13, 2023 5:38 pmI've just been told that the ranking for reserve list is not available. weird that others were told something else
Re: Only related to "Reserve list" Q&A 2022
Strange. German NCP informed my position this morning. Sounds really weird that not all NCPs have this information
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2021 11:54 am
Re: Only related to "Reserve list" Q&A 2022
I've been told they will have these data once all participants will be informed. I guess perhaps they have these data, but cannot share them?
It makes little sense anyway
Re: Only related to "Reserve list" Q&A 2022
91.8% EF-PHY for a UK institution, on the reserve list. I have contacted my NCP and inquired about my position on the list, let's see. Is anyone else in EF-PHY?
Re: Only related to "Reserve list" Q&A 2022
Hi, I am on reserve list for GF-CHE (4.8/4/5), total: 92%. I have contacted my NCP (Sweden) about the reserve list, haven't got any reply yet..... I will put the information here if I get any update.
Re: Only related to "Reserve list" Q&A 2022
I followed the forum from last year regarding people under reserve list with UK as host. They said that a lot of them were rejected eventually due to failure of UK to associate with EU.
Re: Only related to "Reserve list" Q&A 2022
Curious as well to know the logic behind this. Is it possible that the gaps (differences) between scores are big enough that it included scores that are normally considered "low". For example, would it be possible that among consecutive reserve listers in a specific panel the scores could be something like these: 92.5, 92.4, 91.6, 90.5, 89.6, 88.5, 87.6, etc.