Talk Academia

You think they follow an order based on the proposal number? I would imagine it would depend on the domain as well.

Cla wrote: ↑

Sun Jan 27, 2019 11:29 pm

This is crazy
May I ask the first digits of your proposals to know if it is even worth to wait to midnight?
My number is 8392**

And we dont even know for sure the results are out today

I tried logging in I dont see the link either

Thats some back story there :P I'm glad we are ok now. Secretly, I think you are rather attracted to my 'testosteronic' attitude :D Thanks, Bren. I appreciated the effort (I am not sarcastic). Now, I am going to change my nickname into "oldladyGFSOC" Hey you little weed, I was trying to be nice and ...

Hmmm cant ignore the misogyny in that post [ quote=danGFSOC post_id=3095 time=1548523169 user_id=110] Good luck to you and all the testosteronic applicants :lol: By the way, cut off score is a poor indicator. The most solid one is to see the increase of funding per action and the increase of number ...

Did anyone hear from their NCP? Normally they get the threshold and the number of funded app details weeks or days before the results was what i recollect?

Mine is on evaluation phase too will be one nerve wracking weekend if its not tomorrow

Mine still shows submission.. I dont know what to think of it

Reply to the post about outreach etc , people are not calling out the idea of outreach etc BS but the fancy way in which we have to embellish it. Certain keywords are expected etc. And in most cases once one gets the fellowship it is rarely enforced.

That sounds great in theory but also not feasible what with the quantity of proposals. My 2 cents i believe it should be two steps and not a sing!e step process with an interview/presentation.that would help understand if the person wrote the app and is capable of responding. I agree but if it were...