Talk Academia

55 people online. We could post cat videos to make the wait more entertaining.

Exactly, when do they notify ineligible candidates? So as of now the consensus of the majority is... Ranking - above minimum threshold of 70% Evaluation - below minimum threshold of 70% Is this what the majority agrees on? Last year there were 8957 eligible candidates. And below the line (<70) there...

"The Grant Management Services may be experiencing issues with Grant Management tasks at the moment. We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause."

I am also ranked since Tuesday.

Thank you Bren, as sharp as usual hahaha That will make zero difference. I also exceeded that limit, and I studied 3 very high scoring proposals from previous years as part of my preparation and they all exceeded that limit too. So don't worry, if we don't get the funding its because our proposals a...

I think they are instructed to notice, precisely because it is so competitive. In any case I will report my score here so that we all learn from it and avoid similar future mistakes

I completely agree with this. I think the rest of the proposal was decent, especially for a first timer, but I assume one cannot afford minor errors like these. If you are all curious, I exceeded the one-page limit for the participating organisation, in a very silly way (changing the font size would...

Hello everyone again :) I personally think it's good that we know we should not extent results soon (thanks Bren and others who posted about if before). This constant wait and forum-refreshing state of mind does not seem very good. I'm not very optimistic because I made a formal mistake in Form B-2 ...

I don't think I have chances so I hope it means that you are going go get it

ATBGF2017 wrote: ↑

Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:32 pm

I feel like rare species

fr489 wrote: ↑

Tue Jan 29, 2019 5:29 pm

845*** SOC, I'm in Ranking (but I just checked, so I cant' say when it changed)

845*** SOC, I'm in Ranking (but I just checked, so I cant' say when it changed)