Talk Academia

I don't understand the reasoning behind this either. Why should the NCPs receive the results before? Based on what reason. What will they do with these results that they need to receive them before the applicants? NCPs have resilts at least a week before official announcement. Will call my home coun...

And in specific details what do you say: a table, a chair, some office space, a computer, printer, scanner, pens, paper, and you put your shopping list there to reach sufficient specific detail ... I think this is really exaggerated from the reviewers side. At this level and for this money this kind...

I think this is really exaggerated from the reviewers side. At this level and for this money this kind of infrastructure details shouldn't be a topic of discussion. Let's be serious, everyone will get an office space and a computer, noone will write her/his articles on the floor and conduct the rese...

I was also thinking that we might get the results these days, before the Brexit

Kenniz wrote: ↑

Wed Jan 29, 2020 5:13 pm

Amar wrote: ↑

Wed Jan 29, 2020 5:12 pm

Small question: what is the Brexit date?

end of this month basically

After Requested EU Contribution I have Contact: with no name mentioned. I've looked at my last year rejected application, I have Contact there also. In my case it show following info: Call: H2020-MSCA-IF-2019 Type of Action: MSCA-IF-EF-ST Acronym: XXXXXXXXX Current Phase: Ranking Number: 896xxx Dura...

892XXX, Ranking

Happy birthday, Kitten! All the very best! And I wish you to get the fellowship ;-) mm....wonder what that means? Anyhow, even though we have spent months on the proposal, and got seal of excellence three times I do not expect to get funded :evil: :evil: :evil: :evil: . But hey, it's my birthday tom...

Yes, I know, I had also a poor quality ESR, and I have read many others in the same note, but it still surprises me ... What I really don't understand is how these things happen when at least two experts read the application. They say three experts are involved. I think that points an expert didn't ...

What I really don't understand is how these things happen when at least two experts read the application. They say three experts are involved. I think that points an expert didn't cover, can be covered by the others, and if one expert read superficially, the others maybe have a more careful approach...

For everyone who submitted a proposal the status is Final. This Final is in relation with the submission, not with the evaluation.

Confusedone wrote: ↑

Tue Jan 21, 2020 8:20 am

Do we any clarification about status Final vs something else. Mine is status Final