Talk Academia

Justt wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 03, 2022 4:14 pm

PANEL: EF-CHE
Status : Ranking
Change: 1 March around 4 pm
Acronym: M
Last name: A
Username: Justt

First timer?

Status: Ranking
Change: Submission at around 9:00 UTC on March 01, then to ranking at around 15:00 UTC same day (cannot ascertain when it changed to ranking)
Panel: EF-CHE
First letter acronym: H
First letter of last name: B

chemcps wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 03, 2022 8:10 am

Sleek_IF wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 03, 2022 8:01 am

chemcps wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 03, 2022 7:53 am

In Evaluation about 48 hrs (CHE Panel).

Still in evaluation?

Yes. What about you?.

Ranking phase
The whole thing seems random really.

chemcps wrote: ↑

Thu Mar 03, 2022 7:53 am

In Evaluation about 48 hrs (CHE Panel).

Still in evaluation?

MSCCCCCC wrote: ↑

Wed Mar 02, 2022 9:06 pm

Given the number of people here ranking I'm having a hard time believing that = above 85%
but what do I know? (first-timer)

In what phase are you?

MSCCCCCC wrote: ↑

Wed Mar 02, 2022 9:06 pm

Given the number of people here ranking I'm having a hard time believing that = above 85%
but what do I know? (first-timer)

Ranking is at least a threshold (3.5/5 = 70%) if I am not mistaken.

Had I got 5/5, I would have been funded. In the first attempt, there were couple of weaknesses and the score was 4.7. I see..! I guess there were other factors the reviewers considered (not mentioned though). Otherwise, by addressing the weaknesses, one would have thought the score must have improv...

I had the same 4.8 but no weakness. I was told that reviewer can reduce 0.2 point without saying any reason. Because a reviewer receives around 20 proposals to review and might gave full mark to only one of them. Others will get 4.8 even they have no weakness. This is my third attempt. However, I s...

By no negative comments, do you mean "no weaknesses"? If no weaknesses, were you not supposed to score full mark? Had I got 5/5, I would have been funded. In the first attempt, there were couple of weaknesses and the score was 4.7. I see..! I guess there were other factors the reviewers considered ...

This is my third attempt. However, I still do not know what the evaluation criteria is. Last time, I did not have any negative feedback for the 'excellence' part. Still, the score was 4.8/5.0 By no negative comments, do you mean "no weaknesses"? If no weaknesses, were you not supposed to score full...