Talk Academia

This has been discussed earlier in the thread, and it looks like unfortunately, instead of discussing points of criticism as they are instructed to, the reviewers are merely cut-and-pasting individual comments to save time. it is hilarious! :lol: I feel so sorry for myself putting that much time and...

Hey sevenrain. Sorry this happened to you as well. I don't think there is a real possibility of re-evaluation but some of us in a similar position are putting together a letter of complaint re: the review process. Please, let me know if you would be interested in joining. x Got my results back, 85.4...

True, but this below is priceless. Like - sorry, what? ;-) weakness: The proposed measures for dissemination among peers in the form of journal articles are not sufficiently explicit: this is to do with the prospective topical areas and specificity, the prospective journals, and the number of planne...

This is hilarious/sad. Can we use this as an example in the letter to EC? Didn't get it - 82% - down from 93% preciously. If that's not crazy in itself - the report contradicts itself, AND one of the sections only scored 4.5 but has no weaknesses listed to explain the missing 0.5 points. Another gre...

People who want to co-author a complaint/op-ed about the review process, please, hold on as we figure out the access issue.

hopefulacademic wrote: ↑

Tue Feb 12, 2019 6:40 pm

Can I join that forum as well? I accept the decision but I want to help in transforming future MSCA reviews.

The more the merrier . If you can't access the forum please, send your email address to CountZ and he will add you to Google Doc we are working on.

Caqn you please paste the link for the Co-author discussion forum. I could not find it http://talkacademia.com/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1068&p=7580#p7580 I am not authorised to read this forum..This is the message I got when I clicked Try this one and if not, can CountZ help? http://talkacademia.com/vie...

I recommend we should raise our voice against the unjustified deduction in the points specifically for re-submissions where the candidate got significantly lower score compared to the earlier submission. I have seen in the forum people are claiming differences of 5-20 in the resubmitted proposal af...

I recommend we should raise our voice against the unjustified deduction in the points specifically for re-submissions where the candidate got significantly lower score compared to the earlier submission. I have seen in the forum people are claiming differences of 5-20 in the resubmitted proposal af...

So, basically, the funniest people on this forum did not get the funding [scratches head]... :lol: Hi all, sorry but i was quite busy this morning. Anyway, did not get it, I scored 76.4; it hurts knowing that you did your best and you were sure to get it. I guess if you do everything by yourself tha...